HOW WE DECIDE
Methodology
AppNarrow is a decision service, not a feature-list directory. The objective is to help a very small business reach the smallest sensible software choice with the least wasted time and subscription overhead.
1. Start with the job
We begin with the task, business model, workflow, budget, complexity tolerance, and operator profile before considering product names.
2. Narrow the category
Products that solve the wrong problem, add unjustified complexity, or overlap with tools the buyer does not need should be eliminated before detailed comparison.
3. Use current primary sources
Decision-critical claims such as pricing, plan structure, feature availability, trials, and affiliate terms are checked against current official product information before publication or material revision.
4. Be explicit about evidence
Unless a page explicitly says otherwise, AppNarrow's current software comparisons are research-based decision guides rather than claims of hands-on laboratory testing. We do not invent testing, ratings, customer experience, or performance data.
5. Compare decision-changing factors
We prioritize the few differences that can actually change the answer: fit, cost shape, operating complexity, setup burden, key workflow depth, tool overlap, and whether a simpler or free solution is sufficient.
6. Separate fit from affiliate economics
A merchant's commission structure does not determine placement or the recommendation. A product can be recommended without a monetized relationship and rejected despite attractive economics.
7. Allow “buy neither”
If an existing workflow, free plan, smaller tool, or delayed purchase is the better decision, AppNarrow should say so.
8. Measure whether decisions are useful
AppNarrow tracks privacy-minimized aggregate behavior such as page use, decision-tool completion, movement from a result into a comparison, and affiliate-link clicks. This helps identify confusing or ineffective paths without requiring an account.
9. Self-correct
Automated health checks look for stale facts, broken links, weak decision paths, measurement gaps, deployment drift, and inconsistent site behavior. Failed approaches should be changed rather than repeated unchanged.
10. Keep the site people-first
Content should exist because it helps the intended small-business audience make a decision, not simply to create search volume. Pages that do not add meaningful decision value should not be multiplied.